* IMHO I think that this bug was opened by a confusion generated by an oldĬonfig file and the default xscreensaver's behavior. * By default there are no greyed checked screen savers. > This is more a usability issue, that should IMHO > I can just go there and make sure there aren't any greyed etc/X11/app-default/XScreenSaver everytime there are installed/uninstalled, AddĪ "xscreensaver" USE flag to those packages. It could be a possibility but it adds complexity to otherĪpplications (like the mencioned above) because they should edit > Just to make sure I'm being understood, this is not a problem with no Its greyed), so you are getting the spected result. You are explicitly selecting a non-existent screensaver (and you know it because > couldn't be run (No such file or directory). It still happens: black screen with text saying that the screen saver > One thing I tested was to select "only one screen saver", and select a greyed
> I can check for it anyway, and will post the result here later. Not come with the xscreensaver distribution and that you can install later (moreĮxamples: x11-misc/xaos x11-misc/xsnow x11-misc/xplanet) Reference of what applications (hacks) are supported by xscreensaver and does Its a behavior that always have been present on xscreensaver. > however, in my opinion, the greyed ones shouldn't even Reinstall xscreensaver with opengl support, then -if you dont have a previuslyĬonfigured user config file that overides the default behavior- (thing thatĪppened to you) they will appear selected and non-grayed. X11-misc/xmountains and x11-misc/xearth (which are greyed on the list) or
If you install one application supported by xscreensaver later, like > I didn't test random screen savers to see if one ofīut I did, and they does NOT apper if you dont select them explicitly. > There are some screensavers that are greyed on the selection list, however I'm > Yes, upgraded, rm'd ~/.xscreensaver and tried again. Unset: ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY Truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts usb userlocales xml xml2 xmms xpm xrandr xv Opengl oss pam pam_console perl png ppds readline sasl sdl ssl tcpd tetex tiff Moznomail mp3 mpeg msn multilib ncurses nls nvidia offensive ogg oggvorbis Jp2 jpeg libwww lzw lzw-tiff maildir mikmod motif mozilla moznocompose moznoirc Gnome gphoto2 gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml guile icq imagemagick imlib jabber java
Xscreensaver install all screensavers Bluetooth#
USE="amd64 16bit X aac aalib acpi acpi4linux aim alsa apache2 asm aviīash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts bluetooth bonobo bzlib cdr crypt cups curlĭga divx4linux dvd esd exif fam font-server foomaticdb fortran ftp gd gdbm gif usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/bind /var/qmail/control"ĬONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"ĬXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"įEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox" usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config krb4 +motif +offensive +opengl +pam -xinerama 0 kB x11-misc/xscreensaver-4.20 -debug +gnome +gtk +jpeg -kerberos
xscreensaver has the following USE flags here:
Xscreensaver install all screensavers software#
I worked for a company that did the same - they were #1 and got comfy/lax and were bought up by another bigger company that retired the majority of their software portfolio.About 50% of the time, when the screen blanks to activate a screen saver, all that comes are some error lines saying that a file (seems like a xscreensaver binary) couldn't be found.Īn example that can't be found is 'stonerview'. Did it TRY to partner with MS? Nothing I've read indicates that. MS wouldn't have run into as many issues if it hadn't made IE in such a way that it couldn't be uninstalled.īut I think Netscape played into it's own demise in hubris with 90% share of the market. But I don't recall these other companies crying foul when MS included software that did the same.
MS included other things that affected other companies - dial up networking, networking and a clunky e-mail program. He's upset that Netscape went under and blames MS for Netscape's demise (and he isn't wrong). I don't agree with it as Apple is just as bad if not worse than MS.
0 kommentar(er)
